Musk wants everything: damages, injunction and more from OpenAI

For compensatory, consequential and statutory damages, restitution and non-recoverable disgorgement and all other remedies that may be permitted by law or in equity, as proven, in an amount to be determined in the action, plus interest as provided by law;

For a trust with respect to the defendant’s ill-gotten gains, property, and assets attributable to Musk’s substantial contributions to OpenAI, Inc.;

For an accounting of all gains, profits and benefits derived by Defendants from the solicitation, receipt, use and issuance of Musk’s contributions to OpenAI, Inc., including the intellectual property and derivative works funded therefrom, and from Defendants’ use of the same for their own benefit or the benefit of any third party;

For a judicial declaration that OpenAI, Inc.’s license to Microsoft is null and void, or, to the extent it is deemed valid, that GPT-4, GPT-4T, GPT4o and/or other large-scale OpenAI next-generation language models constitute Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and therefore fall outside the scope of OpenAI’s license to Microsoft;

For an order compelling Defendants to perform their contractual promises to Musk, as alleged here;

For a temporary and permanent injunction restraining the defendants from engaging in the unlawful, unfair and unjust conduct alleged herein;

For treble damages pursuant to 18 USC § 1964(c);

For criminal and/or fine claims in accordance with statutory provisions;

For the costs of the legal action;

For attorneys’ fees pursuant to Cal. Civ. Proc. § 1021.5, 15 USC § 1117(a), 18 USC § 1964(c) and as otherwise permitted by law; and

For any other and further compensation which the Court considers just and appropriate.