Recently, Republicans added Referendums for the August 14 vote, which could limit the governor’s power and change the distribution of federal funds.
The COVID-19 pandemic and its impacts put these changes into perspective. In a nationwide emergency such as the pandemic, Governor Tony Evers had to Distribute funds He had to distribute over $4 billion and was able to do so quickly and without intensive oversight.
During the pandemic has vetoed a bill that would have required him to submit an apportionment plan that required House approval. Then, in 2022, an audit by the Legislative Audit Bureau sparked criticism of Evers for failing to produce documents requested by the Republican legislature. This led to the current ballot questions.
The first amendment concerns Power of appropriationmeaning the governor would no longer have sole authority to allocate funds without the approval of the legislature.
UW is changing the Student Bus Pass Program pickup process this fall
In a second referendum, Republicans are proposing that the Legislature be given the power to approve the distribution of funds through joint resolutions and legislative provisions – provisions that do not require the governor’s approval.
This could lead to long delays. Instead of providing the funds quickly, the governor would need approval from the legislature. These funds must be approved relatively quickly, and the legislative process is often slow.
This delay could mean that the funds are not disbursed on time, thereby essentially defeating the purpose of their allocation.
In addition, a governor is directly elected by the people, so more power also means more responsibility. Voters have a concrete person they can hold responsible for success or failure. On closer inspection, a governor’s term in office ensures that he remains under control.
A governor also ensures that government policies follow a unified vision and prevents conflicting ideologies from emerging due to a divided legislature.
Given Wisconsin’s polarized nature, these referendums are politically charged. Under a Democratic governor, the referendums can be seen as an attempt by the Republican-dominated legislature to push through its agenda while avoiding a veto from Evers.
If the roles are reversed and the governor needs the House’s approval, it could change Wisconsin’s political landscape. More Republican-leaning bills could gain traction and Evers’ agenda could be sidelined.
Wisconsin is in a precarious position, especially with the upcoming presidential election. These referendums could significantly affect both the state’s politics and its citizens.
A strong government requires a balance between a strong governor and a strong legislature. A governor provides quick decisions and leadership, while a legislature provides oversight and representation.
The allocation of resources should be at the discretion of the elected official, not a committee of politicians. In a looming crisis, time is a luxury that the government cannot afford.
These two branches of government must work together. Although parliamentary approval of resource allocation is not realistic for every decision, there is the possibility of harmonious coordination. The legislature must allow the governor to do his job, and the governor must do so in return.
